California Governor Gavin Newsom Speaks Out Against Legal Online Sports Betting

California Governor Gavin Newsom Speaks Out Against Legal Online Sports Betting

If you thought the legalization of California online sports betting was in jeopardy before, just wait until you see what incumbent Governor Gavin Newsom had to say about it.

Speaking with reporters ahead of next month's elections, Newsom was asked about the two sports betting bills set to appear on the ballot. The first, Proposition 26, would legalize on-site sports betting at tribal locations. The second, Proposition 27, would legalize online sports betting in California on top of allowing retail sports betting at tribal casinos. 

And, well, let's just say Newsom isn't a fan of Prop 27.

"Proposition 27 is bad for California," Newsom said, according to Politico. "It would hurt California's Indian Tribes, increase the risks of underage gambling, and push billions of dollars out of California and into the pockets of out-of-state corporations. Vote No on 27."

Political stances don't get more definitive. Other officials and electoral candidates have hedged, spoken in diplomatic tongues or avoided the subject altogether. Politicians don't like taking chances and risking controversy and the isolation of constituents during election season. Gavin Newsom, on the other hand, flat-out took a blow torch to online sports betting in California. And as we're already seeing, his sentiments are absolutely going to matter.

Why Does Gavin Newsom Oppose California Online Sports Betting

Governor Newsom briefly outlined why he stands against the legalization of online sports betting in California. Let's unpack his concerns and aggregate disdain one-by-one.

  1. Online sports betting in California would hurt local tribes: The thinking here is straightforward. While tribal casinos would still be able to offer sports betting, they would have to compete with top online sportsbooks that have been in the business longer and already have national or global footholds in the industry. The backers of Proposition 27 have tried to assuage concerns by including language that guarantees corporate online sportsbooks would have to partner up with local tribal casinos, but this amendment hasn't swayed enough supporters of Proposition 26.
  2. California online sports betting would increase the risks of underage gambling: This has been a concern in many states—including ones that have already legalized online sports betting. Corporate sportsbooks advertise a great deal at collegiate sporting events, where a vast majority of the fanbase is under the United States' legal gambling age of 21. It also gets harder to monitor who's betting on sports when it's not done in-person. People under 21 can easily lie about their age when signing up for an online account. Though many have said this worry is overstated, the University of South Carolina did complete a study that found underage gambling increases exponentially online as opposed to when done on-site.
  3. Online sports betting would push billions of dollars out of California and into the pockets of out-of-state corporations: There's really no arguing this one. Sportsbooks like FanDuel, DraftKings, BetMGM, etc. aren't headquartering themselves in the markets in which they operate. They may partner up with teams—and, as stipulated by Prop 27, tribal casinos—but their remote business model doesn't create jobs within the state and they aren't funneling their profits back into the local economy. Prop 27 tried to address this concern, as well, by mandating that a select portion of their profits go to combating homelessness. But this was largely seen as an empty gesture, since California already has plenty of funds to fight homelessness and has instead struggled with the creation and implementation of programs to put those funds to good use. Some have suggested California merely spike the tax rate for online sportsbooks, but that number would likely have to climb into 30 percent for it to matter.

As you can tell, these are all valid concerns. And given the source from which their coming, in Gavin Newsom, there's a chance this marks the official end to Proposition 27.

sportsbetting in florida

Don't Hold Your Breath for Proposition 27 to Pass in California.

The latest polls from FiveThirtyEight show that Gavin Newsom is widely expected to retain his post as Governor of California. And though he can't block Prop 27 from taking effect if it's passed, the political climate in Cali is starting to suggest that won't be the case.

Earlier this month, a handful of polls found both California sports betting bills projected to fail. Conducted by UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies and the Los Angeles Times, the extensive survey showed that the majority of California voters (53 percent) opposed Proposition 27 specifically, and that another 20 percent were undecided. Assuming these returns are accurate, Proposition 27 has a slim to zero chance of passing in November.

For what it's worth, we'd lean toward "zero chance." If Gavin Newsom is indeed the favorite to remain the Governor, then his sentiments this close to Election Day are invariably going to convince some undecided voters to oppose Prop 27. 

Between this, the aforementioned poll and the burgeoning distaste California voters had for the amount that was spent on campaigning for Prop 27, it doesn't look like this measure has any hope of surviving the ballot.

What Does the Future Hold for Online Sports Betting in California?

Immediately, nothing good. And the same could be said for California sports betting in general.

Gavin Newsom might be more open to Proposition 26, but that poll from UC Berkeley and the Los Angeles Times found that almost 70 percent of California voters outright opposed or remain undecided on the retail sports betting bill. The share of undecided voters is fairly high (27 percent), but the state would need a 70 percent approval rate from that group to pass the measure.

Even if Prop 26 gets voted into effect, it still leaves anyone hoping to partake in online sports betting plum out of luck. Fortunately, Californians are free to sign up with one of the many reputable sites from our reviews of the top online sportsbooks. Most of these operators allow you to service an account from anywhere in the United States.

As for the future of online sports betting in California? Well, who knows. It certainly seems out of reach in 2022, which means the state is unlikely to revisit the idea until at least 2024.

Take a look at this list of the top online sportsbooks so you can decide which one will work for all of your sports betting needs:

Meet the author

Dan Favale

Dan is a sports betting writer who can tackle any topic from presidential elections to changes in the sports betting legislation federally and on the state level. He also writes picks for NFL.